Skip to main content

How many likes did I get?


It is widely known that the advent of social media brought along with it a handful of issues our society continues to grapple with. From instant gratification attributed to the apps’ addictive nature to mental health issues surrounding one’s follower count, social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram inserted themselves in our daily lives, creating problems we never thought would come with such an innovative creation. Though these platforms give us ways to communicate our ancestors never thought would be possible, social media companies need to begin to focus their efforts on the well-being of their users, not just growth of the platform for growth’s sake.

Facebook is leading the charge. On September 27th in Australia, Facebook launched an initiative to hide the amount of “likes” someone gets on their post. Commenting on the recent endeavor, TechCrunch Editor Josh Constine says, “Facebook’s goal here is to make people comfortable expressing themselves. It wants users to focus on the quality of what they share and how it connects them with people they care about, not just the number of people who hit the thumbs-up.” While this may be true, I’m not sure how effective it will be in changing user behaviors. Since the like button still exists, the instant gratification of getting a “like” is still triggered. Similarly, the user who posts the photo is still aware of how many people liked the photo; this information is just not publicly shared. The envy Constine touches upon in his older article[s] would remain, as “posters” will still post things to impress “viewers” and viewers will still, by nature, envy the poster. I believe this is due, in part, to the habitual behaviors we have generated as a result of using social media so often. Taking away the like counts demonstrates Facebook’s focus on the overall user experience of their platform, but it seems like a band-aid fix until the company can find a better way to curb the envious emotions users sometimes feel when online.

Don’t get me wrong; Facebook is taking a step in the right direction with the deletion of like counts, but, as Constine points out, there is concern surrounding the effect of this initiative on Facebook pages with large followings. Since many businesses and other organizations build Facebook pages to reach and advertise to their target demographics, like counts give pages the social proof they need to prove their legitimacy. It’s also one of the ways Facebook Ads Manager measures engagement for a company’s post, in turn playing a role in the cost of advertising the company incurs. For businesses, by taking away like counts, we take away the social proof associated with a good product. While I believe this move is a smart one to combat pains of individual Facebook users, I’ll be interested to see how this endeavor affects large organizations and companies advertising on Facebook moving forward.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AB5 — A Benefit or A Cost?

On September 18th, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) – “arguably the strongest of its kind in the nation,” according to the LA Times . What exactly is this, you may ask? Well, AB5 is a piece of legislation which, “will help reduce worker misclassification – workers being wrongly classified as ‘independent contractors’ rather than employees, which erodes basic worker protections like the minimum wage, paid sick days and health insurance benefits,” says Newsom . Although this sounds all well and good, “gig economy” companies such as Uber, Lyft, Postmates, and the like – companies that take advantage of app-based technology to allow individuals to work on their own time for extra cash – will likely feel the pain of increased regulation on components of their core business models. Threats may arise for these companies, ultimately putting into question the longevity of their businesses. Since these companies identify their workers as independe...

Op-Ed: Decriminalize Psychedelics

In June of this year, the world’s first venture capital firm focused on psychedelics was established in Canada. Three months later, the firm, Field Trip Ventures, partnered with the University of the West Indies to create the first ever legal research and cultivation facility for psilocybin (the active compound in “magic mushrooms”) in Kingston, Jamaica. Some say a so-called “psychedelic renaissance” is upon us, as research into the psychotherapeutic benefits of psychedelic substances like LSD and Psilocybin has seen a resurgence. But with these drugs still classified as Schedule I in the United States, we need drastic societal changes if we want to see any tangible evidence-based results. Just because something is illegal does not mean it’s wrong. In fact, just because many people believe something is wrong doesn’t mean it's wrong. Since the Controlled Substances Act was passed in 1970 during Richard Nixon’s presidency, the general public has perceived psychedelic drugs (the class...

PayPal To Acquire LA-Based Startup Honey

A few days ago , payment processing platform PayPal (say that five times fast…) announced they would be acquiring Honey, a Google Chrome extension used for finding discounts while shopping online. While most headlines boast about the numerical value of the acquisition — a whopping $4B — I’m more interested in the reasoning for the company purchase. Honey is an LA-based startup focusing on making the online shopping experience better for the consumer. You can download their service as a Google Chrome extension, and then it automatically gets put to use when surfing the web. When you go on Amazon for example and pull up a product’s webpage, Honey will automatically search the web for better deals on the same item — easy as that. President and CEO of PayPal Dan Schulman says , “Honey is amongst the most transformative acquisitions in PayPal's history. It provides a broad portfolio of services to simplify the consumer shopping experience, while at the same time making it more affor...